UKM - Mistress Eris Martinet - UK

acescrushed · 25-02-2016, 10:07

Has anyone visited Mistress Eris Martinet? http://erismartinet.com/ She looks absolutely stunning and as the equally amazing Mistress Sheba said on Twitter yesterday "Eris has it ALL going on"!!!

I'd be grateful of any info.

acescrushed · 15-03-2016, 06:09

No info then? I did some research on Twitter and found findom and a few strange posts. "I hate penis thinking".

I kind of get what she's saying but she's working in the sex industry. No "penis thinking" means no business for her.

The findom thing is a massive no no for me. Time to look elsewhere.

subparman · 15-03-2016, 11:22

I can't recall your original post but she posts regularly on ITC and British caning society forums and has an excellent reputation. I have been, and still am, very tempted. She is however a CP specialist and severe canings is her big thing.

So - unless that is what your in to I would give her miss. However, if that is your thing I would get yourself up to Manchester quickly. She is also visiting the Midlands shortly and occasionally visits London.

acescrushed · 15-03-2016, 11:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by subparman

I can't recall your original post but she posts regularly on ITC and British caning society forums and has an excellent reputation. I have been, and still am, very tempted. She is however a CP specialist and severe canings is her big thing.

So - unless that is what your in to I would give her miss. However, if that is your thing I would get yourself up to Manchester quickly. She is also visiting the Midlands shortly and occasionally visits London.

Thanks subparman. Severe caning is not really my thing so I'll avoid. She certainly ticks a lot of boxes for me but I think I'll look elsewhere.

MissMartinet · 12-05-2016, 09:54

Hi there, Acescrushed and Subparman,

It seems I need to address a few things that have been said.

1. I do indeed practice CP and love it. I did get a reputation for the harder end of things, because I can offer and enjoy it. But for anyone who reads my website & reviews (of which there are over 30 now in a year and a half of full time domination), it will be clear most of my sessions are actually moderate--and I am a highly adaptable and sympathetic disciplinarian. Perhaps even too much so, since all my sessions run over time and there is always plenty of chatter!

I would like to know who or what gave you gentlemen the impression I only do extreme caning so I can address this misinformation at the root.

It's as if, because a restaurant offers lobster ALSO on the menu, clients then complain of the absence of other offerings--even as they're holding the lunch menu. A lack of economic clarity.

2. Yes I do run a (very) opinionated Twitter. and now other platforms. the reason is because as an innately dominant thinking female, speaking up is important to me. Moreover, it attracts its own public. There is a following of men with a taste for psychological kink, emotional sadism, plain speaking. There are so many dommes catering to the regular kind of femdom, bland and pleasant in its tone--I would simply do myself a disservice providing a copy of the exact same thing. I am focused on a product that safeguards my integrity, free speech, and employs and protects my natural dominance. A dominance that is sympathetic as well as truly sadistic. Always consensual.

I have just read accounts of a Mistress Valenska on this website. And the utterly appalling way she has been treating her clients. Yet some still go back to see her. I have accounts of very satisfied clients, and am a highly professional, lucid individual, with an excellent record and the support of many past clients and other famous dommes--yet because I speak my mind, some people shy away, appalled. I find this to lack logic. Can you explain why is it more sensible to put your body in the hands of a domme who leaves you in dangerous bondage on a cross for 4 hours while she takes drugs, than to have an encounter with a person who thinks and is not afraid to do so? I would hope you choose for personal safety, I like to believe men have a sense of logic, even in the pursuit of masochistic pleasure.

3. Yes, I have included financial domination in my practice. I don't practice extortion, blackmail, robbery. It is a consensual market, catering to a group of people who themselves approached me for mutual satisfaction. It is more than that: in the vein of the illustrious Bardot Smith, my financial practice is an intellectual endeavour, to create discussion on some important topics, and stir the scene in a direction of more ingenuity. It is not meant to engage and impose ANYTHING on unwilling parties. It's definitely not immoral, and definitely not "paying for nothing".

If you don't like the product, it's simply not for you. I wouldn't ever see a person who came in for leather worship and steal their wallet. This is not what this is. And not what I do.

P.S. Wasn't the "hate penis thinking" in the same phrase as "I like men"? Isn't a proclamation that in the culture at large, thinking determined by sexual hormones is subpar--certainly a good thing? I mean, I am a domme. Domination and demands for mental excellence cannot be switched off. However, if you seek feminine reassurance etc., may I suggest simply you don't peruse said social media?

geordiesouth · 12-05-2016, 10:47

Wow......... MissMartinet.

If I was ever going to be interested in findom. Then you are the lady (a very beautiful one indeed) I would choose.
I would have to buy a leather wallet of course.

A wonderful post.

Sub-D · 26-08-2016, 08:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by acescrushed

No info then? I did some research on Twitter and found findom and a few strange posts. "I hate penis thinking".

I kind of get what she's saying but she's working in the sex industry. No "penis thinking" means no business for her.

The findom thing is a massive no no for me. Time to look elsewhere.

Not into the Findom thing either, i get no pleasure in sending money to a female that i've never met! Good luck with your search mate!

MissMartinet · 21-09-2016, 08:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sub-D

Not into the Findom thing either, i get no pleasure in sending money to a female that i've never met! Good luck with your search mate!

It seems there are magic words like findom that once uttered in the same sentence as a female, no matter what that female does or sells is irrevocably stained. Get a logical lobe, will you.

MissMartinet · 05-10-2016, 16:47

I don't see where the controversy comes from: it's simple; I allow brief phone conversations for booking, and paid calls for in depth conversation. why is this so controversial?

Among my few areas of practice, I also include findom. Why is this so controversial? I don't demand my spanking slaves they bring over their wages in a golden box. It's a separate thing.

Also, why do men get offended when I call out their false accusations when I have already devoted 3 or more very comprehensive posts to explaining why their assumptions are wrong? Is the art of logic and conversation dead, and women should be now collectively burnt at the stake when they utter things like findom, and their explanations ignored?

I am sorry but I refuse to accept just because I am a provider you are immune from criticism of lapses in your judgment and communication.

To the gentleman mentioning escorts with whips: I agree, that might be better value if that's what you seek. I can only hope that until that becomes the norm, there is a public for a domme who doesn't have sex with the "slave". Here's hoping!

Rehrednu · 05-10-2016, 21:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by MissMartinet

I don't see where the controversy comes from: it's simple; I allow brief phone conversations for booking, and paid calls for in depth conversation. why is this so controversial?

Among my few areas of practice, I also include findom. Why is this so controversial? I don't demand my spanking slaves they bring over their wages in a golden box. It's a separate thing.

Also, why do men get offended when I call out their false accusations when I have already devoted 3 or more very comprehensive posts to explaining why their assumptions are wrong? Is the art of logic and conversation dead, and women should be now collectively burnt at the stake when they utter things like findom, and their explanations ignored?

I am sorry but I refuse to accept just because I am a provider you are immune from criticism of lapses in your judgment and communication.

To the gentleman mentioning escorts with whips: I agree, that might be better value if that's what you seek. I can only hope that until that becomes the norm, there is a public for a domme who doesn't have sex with the "slave". Here's hoping!

None of it is controversial, all a question of choice. And there are definitely those who seek a Domme rather than escort with a whip.

25-02-2016, 10:07	#1
acescrushed Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 71 Reputation: 10	Mistress Eris Martinet Has anyone visited Mistress Eris Martinet? http://erismartinet.com/ She looks absolutely stunning and as the equally amazing Mistress Sheba said on Twitter yesterday "Eris has it ALL going on"!!! I'd be grateful of any info.

12-05-2016, 09:54	#5
MissMartinet Member Join Date: May 2016 Posts: 130 Reputation: 29	A Few Corrections Hi there, Acescrushed and Subparman, It seems I need to address a few things that have been said. 1. I do indeed practice CP and love it. I did get a reputation for the harder end of things, because I can offer and enjoy it. But for anyone who reads my website & reviews (of which there are over 30 now in a year and a half of full time domination), it will be clear most of my sessions are actually moderate--and I am a highly adaptable and sympathetic disciplinarian. Perhaps even too much so, since all my sessions run over time and there is always plenty of chatter! I would like to know who or what gave you gentlemen the impression I only do extreme caning so I can address this misinformation at the root. It's as if, because a restaurant offers lobster ALSO on the menu, clients then complain of the absence of other offerings--even as they're holding the lunch menu. A lack of economic clarity. 2. Yes I do run a (very) opinionated Twitter. and now other platforms. the reason is because as an innately dominant thinking female, speaking up is important to me. Moreover, it attracts its own public. There is a following of men with a taste for psychological kink, emotional sadism, plain speaking. There are so many dommes catering to the regular kind of femdom, bland and pleasant in its tone--I would simply do myself a disservice providing a copy of the exact same thing. I am focused on a product that safeguards my integrity, free speech, and employs and protects my natural dominance. A dominance that is sympathetic as well as truly sadistic. Always consensual. I have just read accounts of a Mistress Valenska on this website. And the utterly appalling way she has been treating her clients. Yet some still go back to see her. I have accounts of very satisfied clients, and am a highly professional, lucid individual, with an excellent record and the support of many past clients and other famous dommes--yet because I speak my mind, some people shy away, appalled. I find this to lack logic. Can you explain why is it more sensible to put your body in the hands of a domme who leaves you in dangerous bondage on a cross for 4 hours while she takes drugs, than to have an encounter with a person who thinks and is not afraid to do so? I would hope you choose for personal safety, I like to believe men have a sense of logic, even in the pursuit of masochistic pleasure. 3. Yes, I have included financial domination in my practice. I don't practice extortion, blackmail, robbery. It is a consensual market, catering to a group of people who themselves approached me for mutual satisfaction. It is more than that: in the vein of the illustrious Bardot Smith, my financial practice is an intellectual endeavour, to create discussion on some important topics, and stir the scene in a direction of more ingenuity. It is not meant to engage and impose ANYTHING on unwilling parties. It's definitely not immoral, and definitely not "paying for nothing". If you don't like the product, it's simply not for you. I wouldn't ever see a person who came in for leather worship and steal their wallet. This is not what this is. And not what I do. P.S. Wasn't the "hate penis thinking" in the same phrase as "I like men"? Isn't a proclamation that in the culture at large, thinking determined by sexual hormones is subpar--certainly a good thing? I mean, I am a domme. Domination and demands for mental excellence cannot be switched off. However, if you seek feminine reassurance etc., may I suggest simply you don't peruse said social media? Last edited by MissMartinet; 23-05-2016 at 11:35. Reason: added P.S.

12-05-2016, 10:47	#6
geordiesouth Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 7,259 Reputation: 108	Wow......... MissMartinet. If I was ever going to be interested in findom. Then you are the lady (a very beautiful one indeed) I would choose. I would have to buy a leather wallet of course. A wonderful post. __________________ A girls gotta have somewhere to park her bike.

05-10-2016, 16:47	#9
MissMartinet Member Join Date: May 2016 Posts: 130 Reputation: 29	I don't see where the controversy comes from: it's simple; I allow brief phone conversations for booking, and paid calls for in depth conversation. why is this so controversial? Among my few areas of practice, I also include findom. Why is this so controversial? I don't demand my spanking slaves they bring over their wages in a golden box. It's a separate thing. Also, why do men get offended when I call out their false accusations when I have already devoted 3 or more very comprehensive posts to explaining why their assumptions are wrong? Is the art of logic and conversation dead, and women should be now collectively burnt at the stake when they utter things like findom, and their explanations ignored? I am sorry but I refuse to accept just because I am a provider you are immune from criticism of lapses in your judgment and communication. To the gentleman mentioning escorts with whips: I agree, that might be better value if that's what you seek. I can only hope that until that becomes the norm, there is a public for a domme who doesn't have sex with the "slave". Here's hoping! __________________ Eris Martinet Website. CLIPS TWITTER

15-03-2016, 06:09	#2
acescrushed Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 71 Reputation: 10	No info then? I did some research on Twitter and found findom and a few strange posts. "I hate penis thinking". I kind of get what she's saying but she's working in the sex industry. No "penis thinking" means no business for her. The findom thing is a massive no no for me. Time to look elsewhere.

15-03-2016, 11:22	#3
subparman Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 494 Reputation: 59	I can't recall your original post but she posts regularly on ITC and British caning society forums and has an excellent reputation. I have been, and still am, very tempted. She is however a CP specialist and severe canings is her big thing. So - unless that is what your in to I would give her miss. However, if that is your thing I would get yourself up to Manchester quickly. She is also visiting the Midlands shortly and occasionally visits London.