UKM - Mistress Lubyanka - Page 4 - UK

Petronius · 18-01-2013, 01:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by balacano

....oh yes...

She is more than well and "fit" with a very strong right arm and captivating "of the wall" Aussie sense of humour!....She didnt mention ML so ill broach the subject next time i think.

I'd broach the subject with caution, if I were you. Mistress Paris used to be a switch, and was Mistress Lubyanka's slave for a while in the middle of the last decade.

balacano · 18-01-2013, 18:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Petronius

I'd broach the subject with caution, if I were you. Mistress Paris used to be a switch, and was Mistress Lubyanka's slave for a while in the middle of the last decade.

...thanks for the info Petronius...not sure why you would want me to add caution though.....is it a highly sensitive subject with these two Ladies then?

18-01-2013, 19:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by balacano

...thanks for the info Petronius...not sure why you would want me to add caution though.....is it a highly sensitive subject with these two Ladies then?

Can this exchange take place in PM

Please keep this on topic to Mistress Information Sought which I believe an answer to Mistress Lubyanka current status has been given

Mistress Adore · 19-01-2013, 21:20

Maybe it would be a good idea to remove the last couple of posts ?

It is nobody's business but those involved who was sub was sub to who.
If this was a lady who had been my sub once being talked about in this way i would not be pleased.

Discretion is a word that would do well to be remembered around here at times.

Petronius · 20-01-2013, 01:04

With all due respect, I am not exactly breaking confidences or state secrets, nor did I mention anything that was not previously published on Mistress Lubyanka's web site (they used to offer sessions in those roles).

Lady Anna · 20-01-2013, 01:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Petronius

With all due respect, I am not exactly breaking confidences or state secrets, nor did I mention anything that was not previously published on Mistress Lubyanka's web site (they used to offer sessions in those roles).

Previously published? I'm presuming not now then.

If they don't mention it then neither should we.

Petronius · 20-01-2013, 02:23

No, not now. Mistress Lubyanka took her web site down when she stopped seeing new clients over a year ago now, and it remains down while she is on sabbatical. When she ran her web site, she was scrupulous in keeping it up to date. But thanks for telling me what I can and can't post on an internet forum - I was completely unaware that it is forbidden to discuss historical information on one.

Having said that, I have no wish to fan flames further. I have PM'd reefknot with some brief background, which I hope explains why I didn't think my post was controversial or out of order. I'm not going to post further on what is clearly a side issue on this thread, and would be grateful if that is reciprocated.

20-01-2013, 09:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mistress Adore

Maybe it would be a good idea to remove the last couple of posts ?

It is nobody's business but those involved who was sub was sub to who.
If this was a lady who had been my sub once being talked about in this way i would not be pleased.

Discretion is a word that would do well to be remembered around here at times.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lady Anna

Previously published? I'm presuming not now then.

If they don't mention it then neither should we.

I am happy with the level that Petronius posted, it was common knowledge and on websites at the time the relationship the 2 Ladies had, however I did not want more personal knowledge being published just in case some of the details are not as public as contributors think they may be.

Anyways I look forward Ms Lubyanka's return, met Her at a few events very pleasant Lady and highly respected, oh for a DD with Her and my Mistress would just have died

Silk Fetishist · 22-01-2013, 17:14

I have never actually met Mistress Lubyanka, but did have a pleasant bit of correspondence with her some years ago, when I booked a session with her which I then had to cancel. That now looks like a great opportunity missed, for I've read nothing but the warmest praise of her. I enjoyed her wonderfully rich and varied web-site too. I just hope to be able to serve her at long last when she returns from her "sabbatical".

Nanker Phelge · 19-02-2013, 15:39

Mistress Lubyanka is back according to her site. Happy days.

20-01-2013, 02:23	#37
Petronius Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 111 Reputation: 10	No, not now. Mistress Lubyanka took her web site down when she stopped seeing new clients over a year ago now, and it remains down while she is on sabbatical. When she ran her web site, she was scrupulous in keeping it up to date. But thanks for telling me what I can and can't post on an internet forum - I was completely unaware that it is forbidden to discuss historical information on one. Having said that, I have no wish to fan flames further. I have PM'd reefknot with some brief background, which I hope explains why I didn't think my post was controversial or out of order. I'm not going to post further on what is clearly a side issue on this thread, and would be grateful if that is reciprocated. Last edited by Petronius; 20-01-2013 at 21:43. Reason: Correction of typo

22-01-2013, 17:14	#39
Silk Fetishist Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 9 Reputation: 10	Mistress Lubyanka I have never actually met Mistress Lubyanka, but did have a pleasant bit of correspondence with her some years ago, when I booked a session with her which I then had to cancel. That now looks like a great opportunity missed, for I've read nothing but the warmest praise of her. I enjoyed her wonderfully rich and varied web-site too. I just hope to be able to serve her at long last when she returns from her "sabbatical".

19-01-2013, 21:20	#34
Mistress Adore Moderator Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 1,730 Reputation: 104	Maybe it would be a good idea to remove the last couple of posts ? It is nobody's business but those involved who was sub was sub to who. If this was a lady who had been my sub once being talked about in this way i would not be pleased. Discretion is a word that would do well to be remembered around here at times.

20-01-2013, 01:04	#35
Petronius Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 111 Reputation: 10	With all due respect, I am not exactly breaking confidences or state secrets, nor did I mention anything that was not previously published on Mistress Lubyanka's web site (they used to offer sessions in those roles).

19-02-2013, 15:39	#40
Nanker Phelge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 87 Reputation: 10	Mistress Lubyanka is back according to her site. Happy days.