UKM - Mistress information sought and reviews - UK

geordiesouth · 27-04-2015, 15:16

I kind of do get what Reefy and his mod pals have done.... Sort of.

I don't think for one minute any of us here on this forum would want to see a thread end up with nothing but bad press for any mistress.

But I also agree with the post above.

We subs have a place on this board too, don't you know.

. With a say so surely.

chris4slavery · 28-04-2015, 08:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by geordiesouth

I kind of do get what Reefy and his mod pals have done.... Sort of.

I don't think for one minute any of us here on this forum would want to see a thread end up with nothing but bad press for any mistress.

But I also agree with the post above.

We subs have a place on this board too, don't you know.

. With a say so surely.

A guide that only gives positive reviews, would frankly be no guide at all.

We might as well just read the Mistresses websites.

geordiesouth · 28-04-2015, 08:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris4slavery

A guide that only gives positive reviews, would frankly be no guide at all.

We might as well just read the Mistresses websites.

I agree......... Please note I do not possess enough virtual ink to highlight.

But such is the review policy of UKM....... Very little can be said on the open board.
I go back to my original ( now removed posts )....... I could not see anything being said by I and others concerning this mistress that warented deletion.

Hey ho !

Lisal · 28-04-2015, 09:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by geordiesouth

I agree......... Please note I do not possess enough virtual ink to highlight.

But such is the review policy of UKM....... Very little can be said on the open board.
I go back to my original ( now removed posts )....... I could not see anything being said by I and others concerning this mistress that warented deletion.

Hey ho !

Well yes. But the word that has been used by both yourself and Chris is review

And we have a review forum especially for that very thing. We will publish reviews there but our policy is that an adverse review will be sent to the lady concerned for her comments and then we can publish side by side

So, that is the way to get reviews published - both positive and negative

ex nihilo · 28-04-2015, 10:26

Gaining anything of value from a review process is unrealistic.

Hugely positive reviews are likely to be sycophantic.

Negative reviews are again subjective and will range from the 'not quite what I was looking for' to the downright unfriendly.

As with all steps into transactional unknowns there is something called caveat emptor.

I don't give any credence to third party reviews given their inbuilt bias (for whatever reason) and make my own decisions and look forward to whatever the outcome.

chris4slavery · 28-04-2015, 14:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by ex nihilo

Gaining anything of value from a review process is unrealistic.

Hugely positive reviews are likely to be sycophantic.

Negative reviews are again subjective and will range from the 'not quite what I was looking for' to the downright unfriendly.

As with all steps into transactional unknowns there is something called caveat emptor.

I don't give any credence to third party reviews given their inbuilt bias (for whatever reason) and make my own decisions and look forward to whatever the outcome.

So all of those review websites and consumer advice articles are a complete waste of time? And are frequented by complete mugs?

You'd never research anything before buying it either?

Incidentally, this post makes no comment about Miss Cameo, as I know nothing about her.

acescrushed · 28-04-2015, 20:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris4slavery

So all of those review websites and consumer advice articles are a complete waste of time? And are frequented by complete mugs?

You'd never research anything before buying it either?

Incidentally, this post makes no comment about Miss Cameo, as I know nothing about her.

Big difference between examining reviews on items and a professional dominatrix.

Reviews have value but in practice idiosyncrasies mean you will probably have a contrasting experience. There are frequent variables to consider when reading a review. Too many.

27-04-2015, 15:16	#1
geordiesouth Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 7,259 Reputation: 108	I kind of do get what Reefy and his mod pals have done.... Sort of. I don't think for one minute any of us here on this forum would want to see a thread end up with nothing but bad press for any mistress. But I also agree with the post above. We subs have a place on this board too, don't you know. . With a say so surely. __________________ A girls gotta have somewhere to park her bike.

28-04-2015, 10:26	#5
ex nihilo Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 6,523 Reputation: 31	Gaining anything of value from a review process is unrealistic. Hugely positive reviews are likely to be sycophantic. Negative reviews are again subjective and will range from the 'not quite what I was looking for' to the downright unfriendly. As with all steps into transactional unknowns there is something called caveat emptor. I don't give any credence to third party reviews given their inbuilt bias (for whatever reason) and make my own decisions and look forward to whatever the outcome. __________________ “We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful what we pretend to be.” Last edited by ex nihilo; 28-04-2015 at 11:14.