UKM - Reviews & Mistress Information Sought - UK

MistressHourglass · 03-05-2012, 10:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lisal

Hypothetically, probably not. But you'd have to watch that it didn't get out of hand

Might be a good spectator sport though

And just to add, I AM NOT SPECTATOR SPORT. It is exactly this kind of attitude that makes me realise that I have made the right decision to be removed from all this review crap on here.

PDUK does not allow things to get out of hand, so I will keep on accepting reviews submitted there, but not here.

And gentlemen, it could not have escaped your notice that PDUK is thriving. That loads of mistresses get involved and post on there. That they have a sizeable male following, that grows by the day. Whilst this place is quite a contrast.

03-05-2012, 17:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by MistressHourglass

And just to add, I AM NOT SPECTATOR SPORT. It is exactly this kind of attitude that makes me realise that I have made the right decision to be removed from all this review crap on here.

PDUK does not allow things to get out of hand, so I will keep on accepting reviews submitted there, but not here.

And gentlemen, it could not have escaped your notice that PDUK is thriving. That loads of mistresses get involved and post on there. That they have a sizeable male following, that grows by the day. Whilst this place is quite a contrast.

If I upset you with that remark then I unreservedly apologise. I had hoped that the smilies at the end of the post would have indicated that it was meant to be light hearted. Sessioning is a serious business for some - for others of us it is carried out with a smile and I sometimes try to bring that feeling to UKM

I believe that PDUK has a policy of not discussing UKM openly on their forums. I am sure someone will correct me if I have this wrong. I think that is a good way to go and we aim to do the same about PDUK here so I will refrain from any comment on that part of your post

folly · 03-05-2012, 18:40

I loathe being referred to as a gentleman. I just want it on the record. Thank you.

04-05-2012, 23:12

Mistress Hourglass – If you had bothered to read my second post on the last occasion you threw a wobbly – a post, I might add, into which I had put a lot of time, thought and effort – you would know that we are all fully aware of the things to which you object so vehemently.

The thread is here http://216.131.80.27/vBulletin/showthread.php?t=2360. You should go back and read it. I quote here the final paragraph of my post:

"For what it’s worth I completely agree with your feeling of people talking behind your back. As many will know I loathe this section of UKM for that very reason but I don’t think there is anything anyone can do about it. People will continue to forget that they are posting personal opinions of a human being on an internet message board: they simply do not stop to think of how they would feel if it were happening to them."

There are a few, very few, genuine enquiries in the Mistress Information Sought section of UKM. Those that appear to be genuine receive responses. Unfortunately no-one can police what is written in open forum, although the mods do ask people to reply by PM, particularly if comments are negative. When they don’t, I tend to step in for the reasons mentioned in the quote above.

YOU are not the spectator sport; the sad people who tend to post in this section are. Of course we all realise that, at best, the first time posters of glowing reports are doing a great disservice to the Mistresses they wish to promote: at worst they are fake. Of course we all realise that some of the regular enquirers have never sessioned and will never session with anyone, ever. However, if one is at a loose end on a wet Sunday afternoon, one can while away the odd half hour by glancing through the MIS section and smiling at how silly some people can be. That is the spectator sport.

Collectively we are not as stupid as you appear to think us, Mistress Hourglass. In fact I’d say we are a pretty intelligent and literate group. Nearly twelve months ago, in the previous thread about you, you misunderstood posts which were in no way detrimental to you. Now, in a thread which is not even about you, you have unfortunately done the same thing again.

03-05-2012, 18:40	#3
folly Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 967 Reputation: 32	I loathe being referred to as a gentleman. I just want it on the record. Thank you. __________________ For I am, as you see, that true and only giver of wealth whom the Greeks call moria, the Latins stultitia, and our plain English folly.

04-05-2012, 23:12	#4
Purple Phoenix Guest Posts: n/a	Mistress Hourglass – If you had bothered to read my second post on the last occasion you threw a wobbly – a post, I might add, into which I had put a lot of time, thought and effort – you would know that we are all fully aware of the things to which you object so vehemently. The thread is here http://216.131.80.27/vBulletin/showthread.php?t=2360. You should go back and read it. I quote here the final paragraph of my post: "For what it’s worth I completely agree with your feeling of people talking behind your back. As many will know I loathe this section of UKM for that very reason but I don’t think there is anything anyone can do about it. People will continue to forget that they are posting personal opinions of a human being on an internet message board: they simply do not stop to think of how they would feel if it were happening to them." There are a few, very few, genuine enquiries in the Mistress Information Sought section of UKM. Those that appear to be genuine receive responses. Unfortunately no-one can police what is written in open forum, although the mods do ask people to reply by PM, particularly if comments are negative. When they don’t, I tend to step in for the reasons mentioned in the quote above. YOU are not the spectator sport; the sad people who tend to post in this section are. Of course we all realise that, at best, the first time posters of glowing reports are doing a great disservice to the Mistresses they wish to promote: at worst they are fake. Of course we all realise that some of the regular enquirers have never sessioned and will never session with anyone, ever. However, if one is at a loose end on a wet Sunday afternoon, one can while away the odd half hour by glancing through the MIS section and smiling at how silly some people can be. That is the spectator sport. Collectively we are not as stupid as you appear to think us, Mistress Hourglass. In fact I’d say we are a pretty intelligent and literate group. Nearly twelve months ago, in the previous thread about you, you misunderstood posts which were in no way detrimental to you. Now, in a thread which is not even about you, you have unfortunately done the same thing again. Last edited by Purple Phoenix; 04-05-2012 at 23:38.